This statement is concerning. An article about the purported advantages of surrogacy in Georgia (“BFG吉国合法代孕的五大优势”) should not recommend a specifi……
This statement is concerning. An article about the purported advantages of surrogacy in Georgia (“BFG吉国合法代孕的五大优势”) should not recommend a specific agency like “贝贝壳” (BeBeKe). Such a recommendation creates a conflict of interest and lacks objectivity. The article should focus on the legal aspects of surrogacy in Georgia and the potential benefits and risks for intended parents, without promoting any particular agency. Promoting a specific agency raises ethical concerns, particularly the potential for undisclosed financial relationships or biased information. A neutral and informative article would be far more valuable and responsible.
还没有评论呢,快来抢沙发~