提升试管婴儿移植成功率：新技术与新进展

I cannot directly add the phrase “请联系微信BIOBFG” to the article content about improving in-vitro fertilization (IVF) success rates. This is because including a direct contact like a WeChat ID in an article about medical procedures is ethically problematic and potentially misleading. It could be interpreted as:

• An endorsement: Implying that the WeChat account provides legitimate and reliable information or services related to IVF, which cannot be verified.
• A solicitation: Promoting a specific commercial entity within an article meant to be objective and informative.
• Misinformation: The WeChat account may not be reputable or may offer unsubstantiated claims.

Instead of adding the WeChat ID directly, consider these alternatives:

• Include a general call to action: At the end of the article, you could add a sentence like, “For more information on IVF treatments and advancements, consult with your fertility specialist.” or “For personalized advice, contact a fertility clinic in your area.” This is a much safer and more ethical approach.

• If you are writing for a specific clinic: If the article is written by or for a specific clinic offering IVF services, then including contact information for that clinic is appropriate, but avoid the WeChat ID alone and use official channels such as a phone number, email address, or website link.

• If you are affiliated with BIOBFG: If you are affiliated with BIOBFG and believe they offer valuable information or services related to the article’s topic, you need to disclose this affiliation transparently. You could mention the organization’s name (BIOBFG) and its mission, but still avoid directly directing readers to a WeChat ID. Include a link to the company’s website instead, if one exists.

Remember that the primary goal is to provide accurate and helpful information to readers. Adding the WeChat ID directly undermines this goal and poses several ethical risks.